LizH, 14 Feb 2016How is this any different than a court order for any other confidential document. Medical rec... morePosting rules point #2 suggest you use common sense.
AnonD-212255, 14 Feb 2016Fine with me. I don't drink and I don't smoke. They both needlessly take lives so I take no ... moreTheron lies the root of your short sightedness and ignorance. You can't seem to comprehend the larger ramifications of legal cases beyond your own limited bubble.
Anonymous, 14 Feb 2016We have lost more people to alcohol and cigarettes than anything that happened on Sep 11. Sho... moreFine with me. I don't drink and I don't smoke. They both needlessly take lives so I take no issues with what you have proposed.
How is this any different than a court order for any other confidential document. Medical records, phone records, computer access. Apple has to put up a good fight for show.
AnonD-212255, 14 Feb 2016Bwahahaha... Go to Mars? That's extremely clever. Did you think of that all by yourself? If th... moreWe have lost more people to alcohol and cigarettes than anything that happened on Sep 11. Should we start rounding up the execs and employees from those companies too?
AnonD-212255, 13 Feb 2016It boils down to terrorism and it's that simple. The killing of innocent Americans in San Ber... moreThis case is from 2014, so I don't see how you can connect it to San Bernadino, which occurred in 2015. There are many things that would save American lives. No guns for civilians. No alcohol would save countless lives on the road. You seem to be assuming that the government wi never use this against innocent Americans. You have a lot of trust in politicians.
This is not about terrorism. It us about the All Writs Act. What is you opinion on the All Weirs Act and its counterpart Imminent Domain? Do you blindly support and agree with the government'do free use of both?
AnonD-212255, 14 Feb 2016Bwahahaha... Go to Mars? That's extremely clever. Did you think of that all by yourself? If th... moreGee Mr Trump, I thought I was being generous with Mars, but since that doesn't suite you I'm pretty sure you'll love it in hell... Good thing your trips paid in full already ;)
Fredde199 , 14 Feb 2016Sooo adorable how indoctrinated you have become, you're government is wiping it's ass with you... moreIts "your" not you're (which is short for you are). And its "I bet", not "I'll bet". The proper way of saying "I'm certain of this" is "I bet", not "I will bet".
AnonD-212255, 13 Feb 2016It boils down to terrorism and it's that simple. The killing of innocent Americans in San Ber... moreSooo adorable how indoctrinated you have become, you're government is wiping it's ass with your constitution on a daily basis and you could not give a shit. remember that you don't have anything to hide until you do. You're country is acting like the Roman Empire and we know by studying history what happens to empires in the end, they fall! The USA will be involved in civil war within 20 year's I'll bet.
AnonD-362866, 14 Feb 2016Well hello there Mr Trump, didn't know you used GSM Arena? Great to see you here :) now I can ... moreBwahahaha... Go to Mars? That's extremely clever. Did you think of that all by yourself? If that's your best attempt at humor, I'm certain you are still a virgin.
I can tell by the way you spell "favour" that you aren't an American and you only know what you're told or what you read. Your real world experience is nil.
Try losing 3 childhood friends in Sept 11th attacks and then see how keen you are on protecting the rights of the these misanthropes that are so keen on destroying the very freedoms they attempt to hide under while you and others like yourself diligently lobby for their rights.
It's OK, you, like many others, simply don't know any better.
AnonD-308243, 13 Feb 2016in a country like mine it could be translated latter as defeating the ends of justice should i... moreWhether the item in question is listed as evidence or not in this particular case, fact remains, however, that the item currently in the government's possession is Apple's IP and is governed by Apple's EULA or other T&Cs or whatever usage ruling or regulations apply. Apple holds all rights to it, too, or do not they when their products are possesed by an infividual or a body namely a government agency?
AnonD-212255, 13 Feb 2016I think it's safe to say that when you mow down innocent Americans with assault weapons, for n... moreWell hello there Mr Trump, didn't know you used GSM Arena? Great to see you here :) now I can finally tell you that you should emigrate to Mars indefinitely and do the planet a favour!
The owner of the iPhone 5s may have details of a relationship his wife doesn't know about. It's not right that any government should snoop on a man's private affairs!
Anonymous, 13 Feb 2016I see you are making an assumption that the case is related to terrorism. If you do a little r... moreIt boils down to terrorism and it's that simple. The killing of innocent Americans in San Bernardino by religious fanatics is what is prompting the government to put more pressure on these companies to unlock these devices.
Do you really think it's about anything else? Then you are the one who is truly naive. Sure, it'll help prosecute those that break the law, but how is that not an advantage?
Would I care if I forfeited the right to have my mobile looked at by US government agencies if it might possibly mean that it helps prevent these savages from killing innocent Americans? Absolutely not. It's really quite simple. Be a law abiding citizen and you really shouldn't care.
Now cue the rurgitation of how it's an invasion of privacy, matter of principal... Blah blah blah BS.
AnonD-308243, 13 Feb 2016in a country like mine it could be translated latter as defeating the ends of justice should i... moreThey're not obstructing the law though. It isn't their business. If the law says it is their business then they will obviously comply, but if the courts decide it isn't, then obviously they won't and they're not doing anything wrong. That's what the case is about.
AnonD-442781, 13 Feb 2016Not really. They're just following the law. If the courts decide they have to give it then the... morein a country like mine it could be translated latter as defeating the ends of justice should incriminating evidence be found in the said item that was listed as evidence to an on going investigation and the secondary charge would be aiding in the commission of a criminal offence and harboring incriminating information to the court. now i dont think a company like apple would want that in thier door step. it doesnt seem wise to obstruction the law in any country if u still want to operate in thier borders.
Trooper, 13 Feb 2016And a company is no longer a company, when it has no customer base.i get ur point bro. fact is every company in any country is a component of the economic system and is fully controlled and governed by the rules and regulations of that contry to comply with and support law enforcement agencies and to provide any detail that they can provided the law enforcement agancy has a current investigation and requires that companies compliance as a legal entity in the country. there are deeper binding agreements between the law and the companies that are founded and regulated by those countries. eg blackberry is being forced to shutdown its services in certain countries due to non compliance with the law enforcement agencies in those countries hence i say it will be wise for apple to willingly hand the details required without even being forced to do so in a court room.
Court probably thinks what the Government thinks and the Government thinks what rich and influential people paid for. USA reality...
AnonD-212255, 13 Feb 2016I think it's safe to say that when you mow down innocent Americans with assault weapons, for n... moreThis is about Apple, and precedent, you lunatic.
AnonD-212255, 13 Feb 2016I think it's safe to say that when you mow down innocent Americans with assault weapons, for n... moreLol! The government didn't give any reason as to why they want unlock the phone and you just assumed it's terrorism without backing your assumption with any info. What we have here is the government asking to unlock one phone that if happened then your privacy is no longer exist and did you stop and asked yourself if they have the phone by legal means then they can ask the owner to agree to unlock it or even get a court order to do so in case he/she refused and there is actually a threat and what if they unlocked it and nothing was there then what.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up